CRIAD
For SubcontractorsData centre delivery · 7 use cases

Every trade builds from someone else's information.

Civils, structure, envelope, electrical, mechanical, fire, controls, ICT, security, fit-out: every subcontractor prices from a tender pack, builds from drawings that keep moving, and gets paid on what it can show. Criad keeps the drawings, the spec, the model and your own submittals in one connected record, so your answers arrive with evidence.

Your window and your cash

Where your margin goes

You rarely control the wait, but you carry its cost. A submittal that sits for weeks comes out of your install time, not the programme. A revision you were not told about is work done twice. A scope gap found on site is an argument while crews stand by, and a variation without evidence is margin you do not get back.

Applied for against certified, by month

applied for certified today certified with evidence
M1
M2
M3
M4
M5

The gap today: variations instructed on site and not yet proven, progress retyped and questioned, a revision built to before it was superseded.

With the record: each application carries the elements, the instruction and the sheet behind it, so what is applied for is what gets certified.

Relative bars, illustrative. No project values.

What we hear most

Four issues, in your words.

01

We priced it from the tender pack in a week. What we missed, we now own.

02

The submittal sat for weeks, then came back rejected on a clause nobody flagged.

03

We built to the drawing we had. A newer one had been issued.

04

The change was instructed on site. Proving what it touched, and getting paid for it, took months.

Use case

Tender scope and take-off

We priced it from the tender pack in a week. What we missed, we now own.

The tender pack comes in as it is: drawings, specs, schedules and the model. Criad connects them, counts your scope from the model, and lists where the documents disagree or say nothing, so the clarifications go in with the bid and not after it.

Open this use case
Electrical yard Electrical yard · one package isolated
Highlighted: the elements the answer refers to
Use case

Submittal check

The submittal sat for weeks, then came back rejected on a clause nobody flagged.

The submitted product is checked against the spec clause and the space it has to fit, before it goes in. Once the reviewer approves it, every unit on site updates to the approved product.

Open this use case
  • Electrical cabinets96model: yeschecked: yesRequested 1.0 m depth is 0.08 m over the 0.92 m spec limit.
  • Data racks1,440model: yeschecked: yesno open item
  • Hall 2 cabinets16model: yeschecked: yesAll 16 not started at the day 90 report, package A4401.
  • Contract sheets152model: yeschecked: yesno open item
  • Published files315model: yeschecked: yesno open item
2open items, each linked to its elements and sheet
152sheets read as data
Checks re-run on every revision

Where the model, the drawings and the spec disagree, as of the current revision. Values from a reference campus.

Use case

Spec, local code and vendor guide

The spec says one thing, the local code another, the vendor guide a third.

A global spec meets a local rule on every project, and a tenant standard for pathways and conduit often arrives on top. Criad loads the code and the tenant standard beside the spec and the vendor guide, shows where they disagree, and checks the model against each. The finding goes to the person who decides, with every source cited.

Open this use case

A finding, as it would be raised

One reader is mounted above wheelchair reach

  • Local rulewheelchair reach 1.10 to 1.30 magrees
  • Vendor guide1.38 to 1.50 m, standing adultsno ruling
  • Specno mounting height givenno ruling
  • Modelone reader measured at 1.50 mconflicts

The rule sets the height. The model shows the height. People decide what to do about it.

A finding, as it would be raised

Two zones have one alarm where the code may require two

  • Local codeat least 2 alarms in this class of zoneagrees
  • Model1 alarm in each of two zonesconflicts
  • Submittalproduct approvedagrees

The code sets the count. The model shows the count. The designers decide.

Use case

Scope and demarcation gaps

Nobody priced the link between our scope and theirs. We found out on site.

Every element is linked to the package it is built under. Trace a path end to end and the gaps show: a link with no package against it, or a link with two.

Open this use case

42U RACK · DATA HALL

  • 0.60 × 1.20 × 2.00 m
  • 240 per hall
  • 1 of 1,440 on campus
  • measured in

    3D MODEL

    Real geometry, shared origin: sizes and

    clearances are measured, never guessed

  • drawn on

    GOVERNING DRAWING

    telecom layout · rev 1 · issued 17 Jul 2026

    a new revision updates every element on it

  • limited by

    SPEC CLAUSE

    envelope max 0.60 × 1.20 × 2.00 m · telecom spec

    ✓ checked automatically, every revision

  • ordered as

    PRODUCT & ORDER

    one approved product · 1,440 units

    approve once, the whole order updates

  • built under

    PROGRESS

    status per rack · phase-aware, both phases

    reports roll up live, nothing retyped

  • operated as

    OPERATIONS

    O&M row · warranty · fibre & power paths

    the handover is these links, kept alive

real values from a structured reference campus

Use case

The right drawing to build from

We built to the drawing we had. A newer one had been issued.

Every element knows the sheets it is drawn on. When a revision lands, Criad lists what changed inside your scope, which of your shop drawings and orders it touches, and who in your team needs to know, before anyone fabricates or installs to the old sheet.

Open this use case
Telecom layoutrev 1
ABC0.60 m

illustrative example

What rev 2 touches

  • Rack row C moved 0.60 m
  • 12 racks affected
  • Install plan: 1 package to re-sequence
  • Who needs to know: 3 trades

Flagged before anyone builds to the old sheet.

Use case

Variations with evidence

The change was instructed on site. Proving what it touched, and getting paid for it, took months.

A variation is only as strong as its record. Criad shows what the instruction changed against the contract documents, measures the difference on the model, and keeps the sheet, clause and revision attached, so the claim is a statement of fact and not a negotiation from memory.

Open this use case

ELECTRICAL CABINET · HALL 2

  • 0.60 × 0.90 × 2.00 m
  • 16 in Hall 2
  • 1 of 96 on campus
  • measured in

    3D MODEL

    Real geometry, shared origin: depth is

    measured at 0.90 m, never guessed

  • drawn on

    GOVERNING DRAWING

    electrical layout · rev 1

    a new revision updates every element on it

  • limited by

    SPEC CLAUSE

    cabinet depth limit · electrical spec

    0.92 m max vs 0.90 m measured ✓

  • ordered as

    PRODUCT & ORDER

    one approved product · 96 units

    long-lead: a change touches the whole order

  • built under

    PROGRESS

    status per cabinet · package A4401

    reports roll up live, nothing retyped

  • operated as

    OPERATIONS

    O&M row · warranty · power chain

    the handover is these links, kept alive

real values from a structured reference campus

Use case

Progress and valuations you can back up

Every month we retype what we installed, and every month it is questioned.

Install status is recorded per element and rolls up by area, system and work package. The same record feeds your progress report and your application for payment, so the quantities claimed are the quantities shown on the model, with the source on every row.

Open this use case
Dashboard
0 / 0
HALL 2 CABINETS INSTALLED
A4401
WORK PACKAGE
Day 0
REPORT DATE

The same check as exec tiles, every number cited.

Excel
ELEMENT
PACKAGE
STATUS
Cabinet H2-001
A4401
Not started
Cabinet H2-002
A4401
Not started
Cabinet H2-003
A4401
Not started
16 of 16 pending
package A4401

The same rows, straight into the spreadsheet teams already use.

Plain text

"Which Hall 2 cabinets are installed?"

source: Progress layer · package A4401

The same answer as a sentence, citation included.

3D view · the real model
Hall 2 power cabinets isolated on the model
Hall 2 · Power · 16 cabinets

The same 16 cabinets, isolated on the real model in the product.

Four renderings, one source. Because they all draw from the same connected data, they can never disagree with each other.
The ask

Judge it on a real job.

Book a call. Bring a real question from a job you know, and see how the answer and its evidence come together.

Your project, as it is. Drawings, specs, model and programme come in without retyping.

Your questions, with evidence. Every answer cites the sheet, the clause or the measurement.

Your people decide. Every decision keeps its evidence for later review.

Stop waiting. Start building.

Book a call with the founders. Thirty minutes, your questions, and what Criad looks like on a data centre build.

Book a call