RFI with evidence
Two documents genuinely disagree. Now what?
Where authority alone cannot settle it, Criad drafts the RFI with the clauses, sheets and measurements already attached, so the question arrives ready to answer.
Every answer cites its source. People decide.
How it works
Ask. Inspect. Verify. Publish.
Ask
A plain-language question.
Inspect
The full blast radius, on the model.
Verify
Checked against the governing drawings and specs.
Publish
A dashboard, report or register, citations attached.
One job, start to finish.
Values come from a structured reference campus, not from a client project.
- 01
The governing sheet shows a 0.92 m cabinet footprint.
- 02
The client instruction asks for a 1.0 m cabinet: 0.08 m over.
- 03
The draft RFI cites the sheet and the spec clause, and lists the 96 cabinets affected.
- 04
The designer gets one question with the evidence, not a thread.
An RFI, as it would be drafted
The client instruction and the governing sheet disagree on cabinet depth
- Governing sheet0.92 m cabinet footprintagrees
- Specallowed depth 0.92 magrees
- Client instruction1.0 m cabinet, 0.08 m overconflicts
- Model96 cabinets affectedno ruling
Both sources cited, measurements attached. Your engineer reviews it and sends it.
Platform capabilities used
The same capabilities serve every segment. Each one links to its section.
Stop waiting. Start building.
Book a call with the founders. Thirty minutes, your questions, and what Criad looks like on a data centre build.